鍙嬫儏鎻愮ず锛氭湰绔欐彁渚涘叏鍦�(gu贸)400澶氭墍楂樼瓑闄㈡牎鎷涙敹纰╁+銆佸崥澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│姝峰勾鑰冪爺鐪熼銆佽€冨崥鐪熼銆佺瓟妗�锛岄儴鍒嗗(xu茅)鏍℃洿鏂拌嚦2012骞�锛�2013骞�锛涘潎鎻愪緵鏀惰不(f猫i)涓嬭級銆� 涓嬭級娴佺▼锛� 鑰冪爺鐪熼 榛�(di菐n)鎿娾€�鑰冪爺瑭﹀嵎鈥濃€濅笅杓�; 鑰冨崥鐪熼 榛�(di菐n)鎿娾€�鑰冨崥瑭﹀嵎搴�(k霉)鈥� 涓嬭級
鍖椾含澶栧湅(gu贸)瑾�(y菙)澶у(xu茅)2002骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│鍩虹(ch菙)鑻辫獮(y菙)瑭﹂锛堣€冪爺鐪熼锛夐儴鍒嗚│椤屽師鏂囧涓�锛�
鈥�
鍖椾含澶栧湅(gu贸)瑾�(y菙)澶у(xu茅)
2002骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│
鍩虹(ch菙)鑻辫獮(y菙)瑭﹂
I. Reading Comprehension
This section contains two passages. Read each passage and then answer the questions given at the end of the passage.
Passage One
Just before Sept. 11 changed storytelling in America forever, my Hollywood agent explained that my new novel was doomed in movieland because it lacked sufficient 鈥渆xplosive moments.鈥� Given this, the fact that the Defense Department is currently consulting with Hollywood scriptwriters and producers to help U.S. generals 鈥渢hink outside the box鈥� is beyond comprehension. Hollywood storytellers invented the box. They worship the box. They have spent their lives mass-producing the box.
As American movie geniuses scramble to reinvent their formula and edit out scenes that might offend post-Sept. 11 sensibilities. I feel a wonderful release. The box is dead. The tyranny of Hollywood has temporarily abated. What will fill this storytelling vacuum has yet to be seen, but my bet is that the appetite for stories that explore violence and mayhem, rather than exploiting them, will have an even broader appeal.
Although the body count is traditionally high in my genre, the best thrillers and crime novels have never been about thrills or crime. They are about the often subtle, often banal inner workings of evil, and about the many shapes of heroism锛�those impossible struggles of the individual challenged by forces that threaten his soul more than his body.
Certainly, some of the landscape of popular fiction is changed. Stock characters that have been so reliable in their ability to scare us silly锛�serial killers, stalkers, hit men, mob bosses, psychopathic cannibals锛�wither and turn to dust in the face of the far more potent forms of evil we have encountered.
Real-life heroes reshape standards for bravery. Who has not tested his imagination by banding together with strangers on that doomed plane, throwing together a hasty plan, then storming down the narrow aisle to tackle a group of razor-wielding thugs? Who hasn鈥檛 imagined himself pushing upward into those smoke-darkened hallways as choking civilians rush out of harm鈥檚 way, while all around us a faint rumble rises?
Thriller writers grapple with the devilish distinction between revenge and justice, and show violence and bravery in their starkest forms. Books like Huckleberry Finn, Moby-Dick and A Farewell to Arms share the gritty sensibility and brutally honest portraits of violence that distinguish the modern thriller.
Since Sept. 11, my Hollywood agent has changed her tune. Now the reason my book will never be made into a film is that the one explosive moment it did contain is a scene portraying an airliner brought down by terrorists. In a book written over a year ago, I鈥檝e broken a brand new taboo. I get no points for prescience and want none. My barometer was twitching: that鈥檚 all I can say. I write about what scares me.
And these days everywhere I look, I see material.
鈥�
鍏嶈铂(z茅)鑱叉槑锛氭湰鏂囩郴杞�(zhu菐n)杓夎嚜缍�(w菐ng)绲�(lu貌)锛屽鏈変镜鐘紝璜�(q菒ng)鑱�(li谩n)绯绘垜鍊戠珛鍗冲埅闄�锛屽彟锛氭湰鏂囧儏浠h〃浣滆€呭€�(g猫)浜鸿榛�(di菐n)锛岃垏鏈恫(w菐ng)绔欑劇(w煤)闂�(gu膩n)銆傚叾鍘熷壍(chu脿ng)鎬т互鍙婃枃涓櫝杩版枃瀛楀拰鍏�(n猫i)瀹规湭缍�(j墨ng)鏈珯璀夊(sh铆)锛屽皪(du矛)鏈枃浠ュ強鍏朵腑鍏ㄩ儴鎴栬€呴儴鍒嗗収(n猫i)瀹�銆佹枃瀛楃殑鐪熷(sh铆)鎬�銆佸畬鏁存€�銆佸強鏅�(sh铆)鎬ф湰绔欎笉浣滀换浣曚繚璀夋垨鎵胯锛岃珛(q菒ng)璁€鑰呭儏浣滃弮鑰�锛屽苟璜�(q菒ng)鑷鏍稿(sh铆)鐩搁棞(gu膩n)鍏�(n猫i)瀹�銆�